Verazo
Log inCreate an account
Compare

Verazo compared to Cyberday

This page compares Verazo and Cyberday on onboarding, pricing disclosure, EU framework coverage, and check architecture, and every Cyberday claim links to the exact page it came from.

Every Cyberday claim below is quoted or paraphrased from Cyberday's own public pages, checked September 2026 and linked in the sources list at the bottom of this page. Every Verazo claim maps to this platform's current build, the same standard the rest of this site holds itself to.

Five dimensions, checked on both sides

Each row states a specific, checkable fact about each platform, not an adjective, and a row is only here because both sides had something real to check.

DimensionVerazoCyberday
OnboardingCreate an account and run your first check today. No sales call required for the core product.cyberday.ai's own homepage leads with a self-serve “Start free trial” button, with a separate “Book a meeting” option stated for organizations above 3,000 employees.
Published pricingNot yet published. Creating an account and running your first check are free today.cyberday.ai/pricing publishes exact monthly and annual euro prices by employee-count tier, from 208€/month (2,500€ billed annually) under 20 employees up to 1,660€/month (19,900€ billed annually) for 1,000 to 2,999 employees.
How a check's verdict gets decidedA deterministic script always decides. Verazo AI only parses requests, narrates results, and drives the sandboxed browser fallback for the rare check with no API. 0 model calls decide a pass or fail today.cyberday.ai/features/tasks describes an assigned task owner uploading their own evidence, for example a log or a screenshot, with automated reminders to keep it current. cyberday.ai/ai-assistant states its AI assistant drafts policy content and explains frameworks, and “doesn't use any of your data or do things without your command,” with no page reviewed stating an automated, API-based pass or fail check.
DORA and NIS2 coverageBoth included among 6 frameworks (ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR, DORA, NIS2, and the EU AI Act), with a register of ICT third-party arrangements and a resilience-testing programme tracker behind DORA specifically.Dedicated pages for both, each headlined “Get compliant with Cyberday,” among a stated library of 80+ frameworks total.
Checks and integrations, as published44 deterministic checks across 24 real integrations today, with 93 ISO 27001 Annex A controls mapped.No published integration count or automated-check count found on cyberday.ai. Its own task page describes connecting tools and uploading evidence by hand, rather than naming an automated API check count.

Three mechanisms behind those numbers

A deterministic check count only means something if the mechanism behind it holds up, so here is what backs the checks, the audit trail, and the trust center above.

  • 01A hash-chained, HMAC-signed audit ledger.

    Every evidence record, approval, and configuration change writes one entry to a hash-chained ledger. Each entry is signed with HMAC so a tampered entry is detectable, not just discouraged.

  • 02Accessibility checks that follow a real user journey.

    The web accessibility check walks a full, customer-defined sequence of clicks and page navigations, such as signup through checkout, instead of one static page at a time, and flags an element that looks interactive but carries no accessible-tree representation for a screen reader.

  • 03A trust center with a custom domain and a real NDA gate.

    A trust center can serve from your own verified domain instead of this platform's own path, with a self-serve NDA click-through for moderately sensitive documents and a separate human-approval queue for the rest.

Every claim on this page names its own source. Create an account to see how Verazo's deterministic checks look against your own infrastructure.

Create an accountSee the product

Sources for the Cyberday claims above